Through
4/26
A round-up of Penn mentions in local, national, and international media.
Penn In the News
Daniel Polsky of the Perelman School of Medicine and the Wharton School comments on the effects of a repeal of the Affordable Care Act on insured Americans.
Penn In the News
Robert Kurzban of the School of Arts and Sciences writes about voter rationality.
Penn In the News
Michael Thase of the Perelman School of Medicine comments on coping with post-election disappointment.
Penn In the News
Kathleen Hall Jamieson of the Annenberg Public Policy Center joins a discussion about the role of the media in the 2016 presidential election.
Penn In the News
They arrived at the field house full of optimism — hundreds of Wellesley students, alumni, and faculty members, ready to celebrate the election of one of their own as the first female president of the United States. They wore stickers that read “Nasty Wellesley Woman” and “Making the Impossible Possible,” a reference to the commencement speech that Hillary Clinton delivered there as a senior, in 1969. “This is going to be the most fun this campus has seen in 100 years,” predicted a giddy 1998 graduate on the bus to the election-night watch party.
Penn In the News
Jonathan Zimmerman of the Graduate School of Education shares his thoughts on how Democrats should respond to Donald Trump winning the presidential election.
Penn In the News
Mark Alan Hughes of the School of Design and the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy says, “The Obama administration’s environmental policies are vulnerable because many of them are the result of executive action, and therefore can be undone by the incoming administration.”
Penn In the News
Kathleen Hall Jamieson of the Annenberg Public Policy Center says, “This has been an election, more than any in my lifetime, that has been fought on traits – personal characteristics.”
Penn In the News
Ali Michael of the Graduate School of Education offers advice to parents about how to discussion the election results with their children.
Penn In the News
The University of Texas Investment Management Co. did its homework heading into the presidential election, studying the last 16 national elections and their effects on financial markets. Then it decided not to hedge against any outcome. “Because there is so much uncertainty, it is hard to know what to judge,” said Mark Warner, the interim CEO and chief investment officer at UTIMCO. “We just decided, while it is an important thing and will have market impacts and we’re all keenly attuned to it, direct action on our part was not something we felt was necessary at this point.”