
nocred
2 min. read
Misperceptions about nicotine abound. Nicotine is not the main cancer-causing component in cigarettes; still, many believe it is. Nicotine makes cigarettes addictive; many people believe it does not.
Researchers from Penn’s Annenberg School for Communication and the Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies at Rutgers University want to make sure consumers understand the effects of nicotine in advance of a proposed nicotine-level mandate by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that would cap nicotine levels in cigarettes at 0.7 milligrams per gram of tobacco, significantly lower than the average level of 10-12 milligrams of nicotine in traditional cigarettes.
Manufacturers are offering low-nicotine-content cigarettes, and while they are less addictive than regular tobacco cigarettes, they still aren’t healthy, says Xinyi Wang, a postdoctoral fellow at the Health Communication and Equity Lab at Annenberg. In a new study published in Scientific Reports, Wang and a research team consisting of Annenberg associate professors Andy Tan and David Lydon-Staley, doctoral candidate Benjamin Muzekari, and INTS researcher Melissa Mercincavage tested several ways to educate people about nicotine, focusing on three groups of people who have been targeted by the tobacco industry and tend to hold more false beliefs about nicotine than other populations: Black/African American adults who smoke, rural adults who smoke, and young adults who smoke.
The team finds that educational messages about nicotine that spark a person’s sense of curiosity are better at reducing nicotine false beliefs than typical nicotine educational messages that simply state facts about nicotine. “States of curiosity are associated with better learning—people are more likely to remember information they are exposed to when experiencing higher-than-usual levels of curiosity,” Wang says. “In our previous research, we’ve found that curiosity can help those who smoke learn and recall facts about smoking, even when those facts point out that smoking is bad for you.”
For this study, the team first tested which of these three curiosity-eliciting techniques had the greatest likelihood of reducing nicotine-related false beliefs among these three populations.
They found that certain curiosity-eliciting message components that worked for some populations didn’t work for others. For example, among Black/African American adults who smoke, the use of questions was determined to have the greatest likelihood of success, while among young adults who smoke, questions were unhelpful, and the use of social signals was determined to have the greatest likelihood of success.
“This shows how important it is to customize messages for specific populations,” Wang says.
Read more at Annenberg School for Communication.
Hailey Reissman
nocred
Image: Pencho Chukov via Getty Images
The sun shades on the Vagelos Institute for Energy Science and Technology.
nocred
Image: Courtesy of Penn Engineering Today