Making insights into ancient marine ecosystems with 3D-printed shells
To understand how ancient snail shells may have evolved to withstand the pressure of a hungry fish’s jaws, doctoral student Erynn Johnson of the School of Arts and Sciences employs a modern-day technology.
Erynn Johnson monitors the progress of the lab’s 3D printer in Hayden Hall as it produces a resin-based replica of a snail shell. Her research, which relies on mathematical modeling paired with paleontology, gives insights into how shelled marine creatures that lived hundreds of millions of years ago evolved to withstand the crunching jaws of predators.
As one metal plate approaches another, pushing with a precise level of force, a small, white spiral of gypsum powder sandwiched in between the two pushes back. Just over an inch tall, the object finally succumbs to the pressure, a defined crack splitting it in two.
Breaking the object—a replica of a snail shell produced from a 3D printer in Hayden Hall—was the point. Erynn Johnson, a doctoral student in Penn’s Department of Earth and Environmental Science in the School of Arts and Sciences, is a paleoecologist interested in better understanding ancient marine ecosystems and what they tell us about future ecological changes on Earth. She’s employing 3D printing as a technique for recreating shells that resemble those in existence a couple hundred million years ago, and she’s testing them under various pressures to replicate the imposing jaws of a predator, such as a fish. Stronger shells mean a snail may have been more likely to survive the crunch.
“In paleontology, we can only infer based on what remains,” says Johnson, who is advised by Peter Dodson, a professor of anatomy and paleontology with appointments in the School of Veterinary Medicine and School of Arts and Sciences. “In particular, when you look at things that eat shelled organisms, like clams or snails, if the predator is successful the shell gets destroyed. So, it’s hard to infer what successful predation looked like—it’s actually easier to infer what failed predation looked like.”
Though still a student, Johnson, who is entering the final year of her degree program, is nevertheless among the pioneers of the use of 3D printing to study ancient predator-prey interactions.
Attempting to isolate the role of shape in a shell’s strength, Johnson develops digital models that slightly vary in that one parameter. She’s able to then print those models and test their resistance to breaking under pressure.
She says that “3D printing has been applied for a long time in other fields, but it’s something that’s been underutilized in paleontology.”
When Johnson started out, she began by consulting with the Biomedical Library and its 3D-printing equipment. But the lab has since acquired a 3D printer of its own, with support from the department’s Greg and Susan J. Walker Endowment, to speed the work along.
Johnson’s background makes her a unique fit for her line of research. As an undergraduate at Cornell University, she was an earth science major with an interest in paleontology but worked diligently on a math minor as well. In a class with her undergraduate thesis advisor, he mentioned how paleontologists had begun applying mathematical models to understand shells.
“I remember thinking that was really cool,” she says.
Tweaking one of the variables in an equation that describes a shell’s shape, she learned, could mean the difference between a clam, a snail, or an ammonite, a type of extinct cephalopod.
“I realized that you could take something that had been stuck in a rock for millions of years, do some modeling, and recreate an ecosystem that no one had ever seen,” she says.
At Penn, supported by a National Science Foundation graduate research fellowship, she found the resources she needed to take these models even further, pursuing experimentation on the creations the models predicted. She’s particularly focused on a period from 250 million to 65 million years ago known as the Mesozoic Marine Revolution, when more dominant predators, including those capable of crushing shells, emerged.
“My hope is by studying this period where we had a major change in predator-prey relations, we can get better predictions about what will happen if we disrupt ecosystem dynamics in the future,” she says.
Johnson and fellow doctoral student Aja Carter, both members of paleontologist Peter Dodson’s lab, each use 3D printing to inform their paleoecology studies. The two organized a workshop on this application of technology at last year’s national meeting of the Geological Society of America.
In setting up her experiments, Johnson has carved out her own path, while seeking advice from a wide range of sources. In addition to Dodson, her advisor, and Aja Carter, a fellow member of the Dodson lab, she’s sought advice from the department’s Douglas Jerolmack, a geophysicist whose work in a very different area—sediment transport—relies similarly on experimentation that requires the isolation of a single variable. Her goal is to isolate the effect of shape alone on a shell’s ability to withstand a crushing force.
She’s also sought technical input from staff at the Biomedical Library and from fellow graduate students at the School of Engineering and Applied Science, where she also occasionally uses space for her experiments.
“We’ve done a lot of troubleshooting because when something goes wrong there is no one you can really ask; no one has done this before,” says Johnson. “Everything I do needs to be breakable, but the printers are designed to produce things that are difficult to break. One type of material is more brittle, but you can’t make certain shapes with it. We spend a lot of time figuring things out.”
Being at the forefront of this application of 3D printing in paleoecology comes with a lot of troubleshooting. These are the printed shells that didn’t make it to the stage of experimentation.
While she’s still following up on a number of lines of inquiry, her preliminary results all tell her one thing: shape matters.
“This was the first study that solely looked at shape, without accounting for the shell’s microstructure, and we found that shape does matter all by itself.”
In addition to her research, Johnson also has a passion for education. She’s served as a teaching assistant (TA) for a few courses and has trained TAs through Penn’s Center for Teaching and Learning as well. This year, she was selected by the Center as a teaching fellow, helping to craft the workshops that TAs take to improve their skills.
After finishing her Ph.D., Johnson plans to continue her research but hopes to keep a foot in education as well.
“Paleontology is a nice gateway for getting people interested in science,” she says.
The Polyhedral Structures Laboratory is housed at the Pennovation Center and brings together designers, engineers, and computer scientists to reimagine the built world. Using graphic statics, a method where forces are mapped as lines, they design forms that balance compression and tension. These result in structures that use far fewer materials while remaining strong and efficient.
From ancient tombs and tiny robots to personalized gene editing and AI weather models, Penn’s 2025 research portfolio showed how curiosity—paired with collaboration—moves knowledge into impact and stretches across disciplines and continents.
Centering joy in AI development and implementation
PIK Professor Desmond Upton Patton—of Annenberg and SP2—and collaborators introduce a joy-informed framework designed to initiate conversations among engineers, designers, and researchers.
Reflecting on Jane Austen, 250 years after her birth
English professors Michael Gamer and Barri Joyce Gold have been teaching courses specifically dedicated to Jane Austen for years. They spoke with Penn Today about their approach to teaching her novels, how they challenge common readings and myths, and what makes Austen’s work so enduring—and adaptable to the screen—more than two centuries later.
Electronic medical records help save lives of HIV patients
Wharton’s Leandro “Leo” Pongeluppe and colleagues found that HIV clinics in Malawi that switched from paper to electronic medical records saw an estimated 28% reduction in deaths in five years.
