‘Curation, Narration, Erasure: Power and Possibility at the U.S. Supreme Court,’ an article by Seaman Family University Professor Karen M. Tani, analyzes the 2023 Supreme Court term, including major controversies over presidential power, firearms regulation, reproductive rights, and the administrative state.
Penn Carey Law’s Seaman Family University Professor Karen M. Tani has written the Foreword to this year’s Harvard Law Review Supreme Court issue, a prestigious opportunity offered to only one legal scholar every year.
Karen Tani, Seaman Family University Professor at Penn Carey Law.
(Image: Courtesy of Penn Carey Law)
In “Curation, Narration, Erasure: Power and Possibility at the U.S. Supreme Court,” which leads off the first issue of Volume 138 of the Harvard Law Review, Tani approaches the work of the 2023 Term—including major controversies over presidential power, firearms regulation, reproductive rights, and the administrative state—as the central “text.” Her Foreword overviews the work of the Term while providing introductory commentary through the particular lens of a legal historian.
“I started thinking about archives and what kind of insights we gain from thinking seriously about historians’ source bases, their limitations, and the craft that goes into making history,” says Tani. “I saw an analogy between the way the Court is picking the cases on its docket and what happens as historians search out traces of the past and then use those traces to tell stories. It was sort of using the historian’s toolkit to think differently about Supreme Court discretion.”
Using terms borrowed from history and the humanities, Tani describes three Supreme Court’s uses of power—curation, narration, and erasure. These also serve as the Foreword’s structure. Analyzed together, Tani writes, they “can help us better understand the current Court, as well as its past and future iterations.”
In Part I, Tani explores how the Court used its discretion to shape the content of the 2023 term, with an overview of the Court’s certiorari process. The concept of curation offers a way of thinking about what issues the justices brought into view, as well as what they left out.
Tani shows how recent events, along with the Court’s own recent decisions, inherently affected the items on the docket for the 2023 term. She highlights cases “focused heavily on the work of the federal administrative state,” and those stemming from the docketing choices and decisions in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen and Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, as well as the 2020 presidential election and “ensuing efforts to thwart the peaceful transfer of power.”
Griffin Pitt, right, works with two other student researchers to test the conductivity, total dissolved solids, salinity, and temperature of water below a sand dam in Kenya.
Griffin Pitt’s upbringing made her passionate about water access and pollution, and Penn has given her the opportunity to explore these issues back home in North Carolina and abroad.
Helping robots work together to explore the Moon and Mars
Penn Engineers, NASA, and five other universities tested robotic systems designed to help unmanned explorers cooperate in the dunes of White Sands, New Mexico, paving the way for Moon and Mars exploration.
From framework to actions: Provost John L. Jackson Jr. talks Penn Forward
In a Q&A, Provost John L. Jackson Jr. explains the relationship between the strategic framework In Principle and Practice and Penn Forward—a new University-wide process and action plan that will advance Penn forward for the next decade and beyond.
