Remote learning affected high schoolers’ social, emotional health
Research from Angela Duckworth and colleagues found that teenagers who attended school virtually fared worse than classmates who went in person, results that held even when accounting for variables like gender, race, and socioeconomic status.
The new school year is quickly approaching. Yet researchers are still trying to understand how last year’s remote learning—mandated by many districts—influenced students. New research from Penn psychologist Angela Duckworth published in the journal Educational Researcher focuses on remote learning by high school students.
Specifically, Duckworth and colleagues from the nonprofit Character Lab, the organization Mathematica, and Temple University looked at data from more than 6,500 students in grades 9 through 12, some of whom attended virtual school full-time, others who attended in person. Those who were remote reported lower levels of social, emotional, and academic well-being, findings that held even when the researchers accounted for factors like gender, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
Angela Duckworth is the Rosa Lee and Egbert Chang Professor in the School of Arts & Sciences and the Wharton School. She co-leads the University’s Behavior Change for Good initiative and Wharton People Analytics and co-founded and runs the Character Lab.
“There is a thriving gap,” says Duckworth, the Rosa Lee and Egbert Chang Professor and one of Character Lab’s founders. “On every measure tested we saw a difference favoring kids who were in-person versus learning at home and therefore, alone. We’re inferring from this that, all things being equal, teenagers would really prefer to be with each other and with adults like their teachers, not home with Mom and Dad.”
Collecting these data began long before the pandemic, through the Character Lab Research Network. Three times a year, participants complete a Student Thriving Index, which asks them to rate facets of their well-being, including how well they think they fit in, whether there’s a trustworthy adult at school, how happy or sad they feel, and how interesting they find their classes.
“It’s a way of taking the pulse on how students are feeling,” Duckworth says. “As researchers, we’ve realized there’s only one way to truly know how teenagers are doing, and that’s to ask them.”
Student participants had completed a survey in February 2020, which the researchers used as a pre-pandemic baseline. The following survey took place in October; at that time 4,202 students were attending school remotely and 2,374 students were going in person. Because Duckworth and colleagues hadn’t randomly assigned participants into these groups, they made sure to control for whatever variables they could.
RELATED
For 10th, 11th, and 12th graders, the findings were clear: Those on Zoom school struggled more than their peers taking classes in person. But for 9th graders, the divide between groups was much smaller. The researchers had a few guesses why.
“Maybe 9th graders had never experienced high school before, so their pandemic fall semester wasn’t as influenced,” Duckworth says. “But I think a different explanation, and one that makes sense to us as developmental psychologists, is that the older you are the more you want to be independent. You want to separate from your parents. The period of adolescence is when you transition from being a dependent child to an independent adult.”
During the pandemic, researchers have paid a great deal of attention to young children, and rightly so, Duckworth says. But to her, this work shows the importance of closely watching what’s happening to teenagers, too. Their social and emotional needs should be part of the calculus when school districts determine and implement remote-schooling policies for the upcoming year, she says.
Like much about the pandemic, it’s hard to say whether acute blips like this will become long-term challenges for teenagers. Duckworth expects most young people will bounce back. “It would be consistent with what we know about adolescent development,” she says. “The most common response to adversity is resilience. It’s the rule, not the exception.” She and colleagues will continue collecting data to test that hypothesis and many others.
Funding for this research came from the John Templeton Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation.
Other researchers on this work included Emma Satlof-Bedrick and Sean Talamas of the Character Lab; Benjamin Lira, an incoming Penn Ph.D. student; Laurence Steinberg of Temple University; and Tim Kautz and Amy Defnet of the data analytics organization Mathematica.
Griffin Pitt, right, works with two other student researchers to test the conductivity, total dissolved solids, salinity, and temperature of water below a sand dam in Kenya.
Griffin Pitt’s upbringing made her passionate about water access and pollution, and Penn has given her the opportunity to explore these issues back home in North Carolina and abroad.
Helping robots work together to explore the Moon and Mars
Penn Engineers, NASA, and five other universities tested robotic systems designed to help unmanned explorers cooperate in the dunes of White Sands, New Mexico, paving the way for Moon and Mars exploration.
From framework to actions: Provost John L. Jackson Jr. talks Penn Forward
In a Q&A, Provost John L. Jackson Jr. explains the relationship between the strategic framework In Principle and Practice and Penn Forward—a new University-wide process and action plan that will advance Penn forward for the next decade and beyond.
