Generally, as people age, the rate of mortality increases. Yet there’s one period, the timeframe between a child’s first day of life and age 5, when mortality tends to decrease as the child gets older.
This concept, known as the under-5 mortality rate, often acts as a barometer for how well a country or population is doing with child health and social development. It can also pinpoint vulnerabilities and underlying causes of death for this population. Though UNICEF, the United Nations branch focused on child welfare globally, has tracked these data for years, the models available in the field were imprecise and outdated.
Now, Penn demographer Michel Guillot, postdoctoral fellow Andrea Verhulst, and colleagues have created a new model for studying under-5 mortality. They developed it in high-income countries, then compared those findings to mortality data from low- and middle-income countries. In a paper published in The Lancet Global Health, they show that in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia newborns up to 28 days old and children 6 months to 5 years old are dying at greater rates than expected.
“We know already that these two places have a higher level of under-5 mortality than other regions. That’s well-known,” says Guillot, senior paper author and a professor in Penn’s Department of Sociology. “We’re showing that not only do they have that, but the way that mortality is distributed by age is different than other places based on the comparison.”
The numbers here are significant, says Verhulst, first paper author and part of Penn’s Population Studies Center. “In 2020 there were approximately 5 million under-5 deaths, and 4 million occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. These patterns that we identified correspond to 80% of under-5 deaths worldwide.”
For years, Guillot has been part of a UNICEF advisory group that tracks progress of child survival worldwide. Though the models being used were the best available at the time, some in the field questioned their overall quality. Guillot began thinking about how to take a more granular look.
He enlisted the help of Verhulst, a postdoc in his lab, and they built a new model, incorporating data from 25 high-income countries. Then, for 81 low- and middle-income countries, they analyzed data from 1966 to 2020 for 22 age groups that ranged from birth to 5 years.
“Initially we had gathered archival data from North America and Europe from the 19th century to today to come up with a dataset that represents the experience of those high-income countries,” says Guillot. “For the second stage of the project, we asked, ‘How about low- and middle-income countries. Do they have the same shape? Does mortality between 0 and 5 decline with age?’ We knew some differences had been documented, but we wanted to get a global overview.”
Using the 22 age groups they’d delineated, they assessed for low- and middle-income countries how the probability of dying deviated from what they would expect to see, then compared that to historical mortality data from 25 high-income countries. “We found that in two regions—South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa—there was a higher concentration of mortality between 0 and 28 days of life and after 6 months of age at all levels of mortality,” Verhulst says. “It was different from the historical experience of high-income countries but also of all other regions.”
The researchers suspect that the excess mortality happening before 28 days likely has something to do with fetal malnutrition and maternal health. The excess mortality they documented after six months may relate to disease exposure at that mark, the point when a child often transitions from breastfeeding to solid foods.
“In most parts of the world, that vulnerable moment is not so problematic anymore,” Guillot says. “But in these two places, something happens. The excess mortality becomes more pronounced.” In other words, although mortality continues declining from 6 months to 5 years, it’s not happening as fast as in other countries.
Guillot, Verhulst, and colleagues plan to continue studying the underlying causes of these vulnerabilities. “If these hypotheses are validated,” says Verhulst, “you could use the new model as a way to approximate underlying causes of death, particularly in settings where you don’t have data to measure these factors, which is very common in these two regions.” Ultimately, they say, better understanding these mortality numbers can help drive specific and specifically timed interventions for susceptible populations.
Funding for this work came from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health.
Michel Guillot is a professor in the Department of Sociology and a research associate in the Population Studies Center in the School of Arts & Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania.
Andrea Verhulst is a postdoctoral fellow in Penn’s Population Studies Center.
Other contributors to the research included the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine’s Julio Romero Prieto, Hallie Eilerts-Spinelli, and Georges Reniers; the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research’s Nurul Alam; the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Daniel J. Erchick, Joanne Katz, Li Liu, Seema Subedi, and Francisco Villavicencio; Patrick Gerland of the United Nations; Bruno Lankoande of the Université de Ouagadougou; and Gilles Pison of the French Institute for Demographic Studies.
