Language in tweets offers insight into community-level well-being
In a Q&A, researcher Lyle Ungar discusses why counties that frequently use words like ‘love’ aren’t necessarily happier, plus how techniques from this work led to a real-time COVID-19 wellness map.
Lyle Ungar, a professor in the School of Engineering and Applied Science and one of the principal investigators of the World Well-Being Project, which has spent more than half a decade working on ways to grasp the emotional satisfaction and happiness of specific places.
People in different areas across the United States reacted differently to the threat of COVID-19. Some imposed strict restrictions, closing down most businesses deemed nonessential; others remained partially open.
Such regional distinctions are relatively easy to quantify, with their effects generally understandable through the lens of economic health. What’s harder to grasp is the emotional satisfaction and happiness specific to each place, a notion Penn’s World Well-Being Project has been working on for more than five years.
In 2017, the group published the WWBP Map, a free, interactive tool that displays characteristics of well-being by county based on Census data and billions of tweets. Recently, WWBP partnered with Penn Medicine’s Center for Digital Health to create a COVID map, which reveals in real time how people across the country perceive COVID-19 and how it’s affecting their mental health.
That map falls squarely in line with a paper published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by computer scientist Lyle Ungar, one of the principal investigators of the World Well-Being Project, and colleagues from Stanford University, Stony Brook University, the National University of Singapore, and the University of Melbourne.
By analyzing 1.5 billion tweets and controlling for common words like “love” or “good,” which frequently get used to connote a missing aspect of someone’s life rather than a part that’s fulfilled, the researchers found they could discern subjective well-being at the county level. “We have a long history of collecting people’s language and asking people who are happier or sadder what words they use on Facebook and on Twitter,” Ungar says. “Those are mostly individual-level models. Here, we’re looking at community-level models.”
In a conversation with Penn Today, Ungar describes the latest work, plus how it’s useful in the time of COVID-19 and social distancing.
What prompted the most recent research?
Our goal was to understand how well different regions are doing month by month, say, by U.S. county. Companies like Gallup do some polling. They ask how satisfied with your life and how stressed you are, but they don’t poll enough people to know, say, how people in Santa Clara County are doing this month. Particularly in the current era, where things are different this month from last, we’d love to have more detailed spatial and temporal resolution.
However, asking a bunch of people these questions is super expensive. Probably the best way to get at this information is to monitor the words that people produce. A good public source of those words is Twitter, so we, like lots of researchers, have been grabbing billions of tweets and looking at words.
When you say ‘word,’ what do you mean?
Everything’s a word. An emoticon’s a word.
Ok, so you pull every word from more than 1.5 billion tweets. Then what?
We try to figure out where they came from, which U.S. county they came from, which we can do for maybe a quarter of them by looking at the profiles. Then we go to Gallup, which has nicely shared with us its survey information, and we take the average over multiple years of answers to the questions they’ve asked. For the more populous counties, we have both the words people used and the average satisfaction with life reported, and then it’s pretty simple. We look at which words correlate. Which are used more in happier counties? Which are used less in happier counties?
What did analyzing the words in those tweets tell you about how satisfied people are?
You’d think that places that are tweeting more words like ‘happy’ and ‘love’ and ‘excited’ would be happier and that places tweeting more words like ‘depressed,’ ‘miserable,’ ‘unhappy,’ and ‘sad’ would be less happy. We found that was mostly the case, but not entirely.
Counties that talk more about ‘love’ are, on average, less happy, less satisfied with life than ones that tweet less about it, even though we know that there are many good things about love. Using the word ‘love’ is not, on average, indicative of happiness, however. That’s true of other common words like ‘LOL’ and ‘good’ and ‘respect,’ which you think are positive but can be used negatively, as in the case of, ‘I get no respect.’ Words that are positive or negative don’t necessarily convey the feeling that you might think they would.
How does this fit into the overall body of work you’ve done in this area? What differentiates it?
We’ve been trying to understand how we can use the language in social media to identify people who are more or less stressed, lonely, empathetic, or depressed. Many models were built at the individual level. But it’s not always the case that individual-level models generalize perfectly to communities. Communities require different analysis. What we’re trying to do in this work is to better understand how we can predict for this community how stressed they are this month versus last month.
It seems like this work could have implications for the situation we’re in with COVID-19 and social distancing. Can you talk about that?
We’re pulling tweets every day, and we can monitor how different parts of the U.S. are faring over time using the models we developed. How are different regions in the U.S. shifting? We also pull tweets that mention COVID-related terms. As COVID passes through the U.S., people seem to be discussing different symptoms of the disease at different times, having different arguments about masks. These data also show us how stress levels are changing. Not surprisingly, people are, on average, way more stressed and anxious.
We just submitted a paper that finds that for the average person in one of our studies the overall decrease in happiness is comparable to going from a weekend day to a weekday. In general, Saturdays are happy days in America. On Mondays and Tuesdays, people are not quite as happy. Every day is now like a weekday. If you lose your job it is, of course, far worse.
The Penn COVID-19 Twitter map recently went live. What does it show?
It allows you to look state by state at what people are saying about COVID, as well as some measurements of how stressed and anxious people are. It’s a concrete version of, ‘Click on this page, look for this state,’ and see how stressed or anxious they are, as estimated by their Twitter language. These techniques are particularly important in these fast-changing times. The mental health of America is changing very quickly, and these methods are currently our best way to get at rapid changes in stress, anxiety, and depression across the U.S.
When the Schuylkill swallowed the city: Lessons from Hurricane Ida’s historic flood
New Penn research shows that Hurricane Ida wasn’t a once-in-a-century anomaly but a preview of how climate change, urbanization, and aging infrastructure are rewriting flood risk.
The Fed explained: What it does and why it matters
Former Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker and financial historian Peter Conti-Brown, both Wharton professors, unpack the central bank’s origins, its unusual structure, and the quiet ways it shapes the economy
How population changes are impacting primary education worldwide
Research from Penn sociologist Emily Hannum and colleagues reveals regional trends in whether school-age populations are increasing, plateauing, or decreasing—and shows how different countries are responding.
A bioengineered bean gum from the lab of Penn Dental’s Henry Daniell is found to reduce the levels of three microbes associated with head and neck squamous cell cancer to almost zero, without affecting the beneficial bacteria normally found in the mouth.
Fighting oral cancer with bioengineered chewing gum
Research led by Penn Dental’s Henry Daniell shows that antiviral and antibacterial chewing gums reduce the levels of three microbes linked to worse outcomes in oral cancers, paving the way for more effective and affordable therapies.
